Составьте пожалуйста топик по тексту
"Outlines of Constitutional Law"
(after Chalmers and Asquith's)
To understand English constitutional law it is necessary to study numerous documents, including constitutional treaties like the Bill of Rights, various statutes and judicial decisions and others.'But the whole of the Constitution of Britain will not be found in any of these documents.
The English constitution, though partly written, is yet to be regarded as
"unwritten" from the standpoint of constitutional lawyers, as it is not codified as a whole in any particular document or documents. The English Constitution is considered to be flexible because Parliament can
"make or unmake" any law' by the same procedure and with the same
ease.
The Constitution is not the source of the law, but the law gives bith to the Constitution.
Though the King (Queen) is the nominal Sovereign, any particular Patiamen darithe rigers o of is existence is legally supreme.
In England the rights of the subject are mostly deduced from actual dions in wiid ree dies have been afforded for their inva from. teusi
codes the right.
i sometimes said that under the English Constution the sion. y prit In administering justice the Judges enjoy little arbitrary power. The lay which they administer is defined by statutes and other documents having statutory validity", and by judicial precedents.*
Theory and practice concerning English constitutional law are diver-gent, as it is seen from the following illustrations:
1. In theory the Sovereign is to be an active party to the making of lavs, but in practice he has a shadowy veto.
2. In theory every Lord of Parliament is a Judge of the House of Lords, entitled to take part in appeals from the lower Courts; in practice he always absents himself unless qualified by statute to sit there as one of the quorum'".
3. In theory certain persons (e.g. Lord Mayor) are invested with judicial powers at trials in the Central Criminal Court, but in practice they don't take part in judicial work there.
4. In theory certain public departments are supposed to be controlled by boards consisting of various high officials (e.g. the Board of Trade), but the real head is a single Minister of the Crown (e.g. the President of the Board of Trade).
5. Finally, Legislature and Executive are joined together by a connecting chain — the Cabinet, ,
Certain important Conventions control the entire working ot the Con-stitution. These Conventions relate to the duties of the King as a person, the duties of the Ministers of the Crown and so on. Differences between the English and American Constitutions:
1. In America the President is in practice more of a ruler than the English King but his legal powers are more restricted.
2. The President can veto legislation, and the English King has legally an absolute but in practice a very shadowy power of veto which has not been exercised since long times.
3. The English Constitution is flexible, the American — rigid, i.e. in England all laws can be altered with ease, and in America complicated machinery is necessary for the alteration of the Constitution.
4. The American Constitution is written; the English Constitution is unwritten.
5. The English Crown is inherited; the American President is elected
for a term.
6. The American President is not dependent on the vote of the Con-gress; in England the Cabinet is dependent on the vote of the House of Commons. In America, therefore, the Executive is not responsible to the Legislature. England is the only country possessing hereditary legislators.
Составьте пожалуйста топик по тексту
"Outlines of Constitutional Law"
(after Chalmers and Asquith's)
To understand English constitutional law it is necessary to study numerous documents, including constitutional treaties like the Bill of Rights, various statutes and judicial decisions and others.'But the whole of the Constitution of Britain will not be found in any of these documents.
The English constitution, though partly written, is yet to be regarded as
"unwritten" from the standpoint of constitutional lawyers, as it is not codified as a whole in any particular document or documents. The English Constitution is considered to be flexible because Parliament can
"make or unmake" any law' by the same procedure and with the same
ease.
The Constitution is not the source of the law, but the law gives bith to the Constitution.
Though the King (Queen) is the nominal Sovereign, any particular Patiamen darithe rigers o of is existence is legally supreme.
In England the rights of the subject are mostly deduced from actual dions in wiid ree dies have been afforded for their inva from. teusi
codes the right.
i sometimes said that under the English Constution the sion. y prit In administering justice the Judges enjoy little arbitrary power. The lay which they administer is defined by statutes and other documents having statutory validity", and by judicial precedents.*
Theory and practice concerning English constitutional law are diver-gent, as it is seen from the following illustrations:
1. In theory the Sovereign is to be an active party to the making of lavs, but in practice he has a shadowy veto.
2. In theory every Lord of Parliament is a Judge of the House of Lords, entitled to take part in appeals from the lower Courts; in practice he always absents himself unless qualified by statute to sit there as one of the quorum'".
3. In theory certain persons (e.g. Lord Mayor) are invested with judicial powers at trials in the Central Criminal Court, but in practice they don't take part in judicial work there.
4. In theory certain public departments are supposed to be controlled by boards consisting of various high officials (e.g. the Board of Trade), but the real head is a single Minister of the Crown (e.g. the President of the Board of Trade).
5. Finally, Legislature and Executive are joined together by a connecting chain — the Cabinet, ,
Certain important Conventions control the entire working ot the Con-stitution. These Conventions relate to the duties of the King as a person, the duties of the Ministers of the Crown and so on. Differences between the English and American Constitutions:
1. In America the President is in practice more of a ruler than the English King but his legal powers are more restricted.
2. The President can veto legislation, and the English King has legally an absolute but in practice a very shadowy power of veto which has not been exercised since long times.
3. The English Constitution is flexible, the American — rigid, i.e. in England all laws can be altered with ease, and in America complicated machinery is necessary for the alteration of the Constitution.
4. The American Constitution is written; the English Constitution is unwritten.
5. The English Crown is inherited; the American President is elected
for a term.
6. The American President is not dependent on the vote of the Con-gress; in England the Cabinet is dependent on the vote of the House of Commons. In America, therefore, the Executive is not responsible to the Legislature. England is the only country possessing hereditary legislators.
"Outlines of Constitutional Law"
(after Chalmers and Asquith's)
To understand English constitutional law it is necessary to study numerous documents, including constitutional treaties like the Bill of Rights, various statutes and judicial decisions and others.'But the whole of the Constitution of Britain will not be found in any of these documents.
The English constitution, though partly written, is yet to be regarded as
"unwritten" from the standpoint of constitutional lawyers, as it is not codified as a whole in any particular document or documents. The English Constitution is considered to be flexible because Parliament can
"make or unmake" any law' by the same procedure and with the same
ease.
The Constitution is not the source of the law, but the law gives bith to the Constitution.
Though the King (Queen) is the nominal Sovereign, any particular Patiamen darithe rigers o of is existence is legally supreme.
In England the rights of the subject are mostly deduced from actual dions in wiid ree dies have been afforded for their inva from. teusi
codes the right.
i sometimes said that under the English Constution the sion. y prit In administering justice the Judges enjoy little arbitrary power. The lay which they administer is defined by statutes and other documents having statutory validity", and by judicial precedents.*
Theory and practice concerning English constitutional law are diver-gent, as it is seen from the following illustrations:
1. In theory the Sovereign is to be an active party to the making of lavs, but in practice he has a shadowy veto.
2. In theory every Lord of Parliament is a Judge of the House of Lords, entitled to take part in appeals from the lower Courts; in practice he always absents himself unless qualified by statute to sit there as one of the quorum'".
3. In theory certain persons (e.g. Lord Mayor) are invested with judicial powers at trials in the Central Criminal Court, but in practice they don't take part in judicial work there.
4. In theory certain public departments are supposed to be controlled by boards consisting of various high officials (e.g. the Board of Trade), but the real head is a single Minister of the Crown (e.g. the President of the Board of Trade).
5. Finally, Legislature and Executive are joined together by a connecting chain — the Cabinet, ,
Certain important Conventions control the entire working ot the Con-stitution. These Conventions relate to the duties of the King as a person, the duties of the Ministers of the Crown and so on. Differences between the English and American Constitutions:
1. In America the President is in practice more of a ruler than the English King but his legal powers are more restricted.
2. The President can veto legislation, and the English King has legally an absolute but in practice a very shadowy power of veto which has not been exercised since long times.
3. The English Constitution is flexible, the American — rigid, i.e. in England all laws can be altered with ease, and in America complicated machinery is necessary for the alteration of the Constitution.
4. The American Constitution is written; the English Constitution is unwritten.
5. The English Crown is inherited; the American President is elected
for a term.
6. The American President is not dependent on the vote of the Con-gress; in England the Cabinet is dependent on the vote of the House of Commons. In America, therefore, the Executive is not responsible to the Legislature. England is the only country possessing hereditary legislators.
Похожие вопросы
Не можешь разобраться в этой теме?
Обратись за помощью к экспертам
Гарантированные бесплатные доработки в течение 1 года
Быстрое выполнение от 2 часов
Проверка работы на плагиат
Поможем написать учебную работу
Топик по тексту "Outlines of Constitutional Law"
Текст "Outlines of Constitutional Law" обсуждает ключевые аспекты английского конституционного права, подчеркивая его уникальные характеристики и отличия от американской системы. Основное внимание уделяется тому, что английская конституция, вопреки наличию некоторых писаных документов, признана "неписаной" из-за отсутствия полной кодификации, что делает ее гибкой. Парламент имеет право "создавать или отменять" законы, что отражает высшую законодательную силу.
Однако, несмотря на номинальное верховенство монарха, реальная юридическая власть находится в руках парламента. Права граждан в основном основаны на прецедентах, а судьи действуют в рамках четко определенных норм, без значительной произвольности в их решениях.
Также текст выделяет различия между теорией и практикой в английском конституционном праве. Например, хотя в теории монарх играет активную роль в законодательном процессе, на практике его власть носит символический характер. Аналогично, некоторые должностные лица, имеющие юридические полномочия, на практике редко участвуют в осуществлении правосудия.
Сравнение с американской конституцией иллюстрирует дополнительные различия: английская система более гибкая, поскольку изменения в законах осуществляются легче, в то время как американская конституция требует сложного механизма для модификации. Также подчеркивается, что британская монархия наследственная, тогда как президент США избирается на определенный срок.
В заключение, текст выделяет важность конвенций, управляющих функционированием английской конституции, включая обязанности монарха и министров, что подтверждает уникальную природу британской политической системы.